HomeProductsZero Deposit™Zero Capital™PlatformsLeaseHub™ZD Rewards™Risk & GovernanceBlogSpeak to Us
← Back to Blog
Case study

How one portfolio lifted occupancy 11 points without touching rent

A ~5,000-unit residential book replaced the cash deposit with a waiver. Occupancy went from 87% to 98%, concessions collapsed, and bad debt halved.

Most residential landlords treat occupancy, concessions and bad debt as separate problems. They aren't. On affordability-sensitive books all three trace back to the cash deposit, and they trade off against each other. Discount the rent to fill a unit and you dent income. Lower the deposit to reduce the barrier and you raise your exposure. The deposit forces the choice.

One inner-city residential portfolio of roughly 5,000 units stopped making that trade. In mid-2024 it moved to deposit-free residential leasing. Tenants choose a small monthly waiver fee in place of an upfront cash deposit, and the landlord holds underwritten cover against move-out losses. No rent cuts, and no loosening of credit standards.

Occupancy followed adoption

Over the next two years, as tenants took up the waiver, occupancy climbed in step, from 86.6% to 97.7%. That is roughly eleven percentage points on a book that had been stuck in the mid-80s. Deposit-alternative adoption over the same window went from zero to 23% of leases. The mechanism is unglamorous. The upfront lump of deposit, first month and moving costs was filtering out applicants who could comfortably afford the rent. Remove it and they sign.

CASE STUDY · RESIDENTIAL PORTFOLIO

One portfolio.
Two years.

+11 points of occupancy,
without touching rent.

A ~5,000-unit inner-city residential book replaced the cash deposit with a waiver.

LeaseSuranceSmart Leasing · Zero Deposits  ·  1/5
02 · WHAT HAPPENED

Occupancy rose with adoption.

OccupancyDeposit-alternative adoption0%20%40%60%80%100%Jun ’24Jun ’25Jun ’2698%23%87%

LeaseSuranceSmart Leasing · Zero Deposits  ·  2/5
03 · THE NUMBERS

Three moves on the same book.

+11pts
Occupancy, 87% → 98%
2.8%→0.6%
Rent given as concessions
−51%
Bad debt

No rent cut. No looser credit. The same applicant pool, with a lower barrier to entry.

LeaseSuranceSmart Leasing · Zero Deposits  ·  3/5
04 · WHY IT WORKED

Three mechanics did the work.

01
Lower move-in barrier
Removing the upfront deposit lump let tenants who could afford the rent actually sign.
02
Deeper cover
3-5x a one-month deposit absorbs vacate balances a deposit never could.
03
Priced on real risk
Underwritten on the portfolio's own ledger data. No shelf price, no cross-subsidy.

LeaseSuranceSmart Leasing · Zero Deposits  ·  4/5
05 · THE TAKEAWAY

A deposit problem,
solved as economics.

Fill more units, discount less, write off less.
Same tenants. Better book.

Built on data. Powered by AI. Underwritten by Guardrisk.

LeaseSuranceSmart Leasing · Zero Deposits  ·  5/5

Fewer concessions, less bad debt

The knock-on effects showed up where you'd expect. With the affordability barrier handled by the waiver, the discounting used to clear inventory fell away. Concessions dropped from 2.8% to 0.6% of rent. The cover also runs three to five times deeper than a single-month deposit, so it absorbs vacate balances a deposit can't reach. Measured against a conventional one-month cash deposit, bad debt fell by 51%.

Same applicant pool. A lower barrier to entry. Fuller building, less discounting, cleaner write-offs.

None of this required a rent cut or a change in who the portfolio would accept. It required removing a barrier that was quietly costing occupancy, income and recoveries at the same time.

Figures: occupancy and adoption are drawn directly from the portfolio's lease data (24 months to mid-2026). Concession, bad-debt and cover figures are from LeaseSurance's rent-normalised outcomes analysis on a comparable book. The client is anonymised at their request.

About LeaseSurance

LeaseSurance provides deposit-free lease insurance for residential and commercial portfolios across South Africa.

Speak to Us